IJIBU11 III* r- THE SOUTHERN PLANTER. ©ebotefc to glsrfculture, gjorttculturc, ant* the igmtseholfc &rts. , ! _ . __ % Agriculture is the nursing mother of the Arts. — Xenophon. Tillage and Pasturage are the two breasts of the State. — Sully. FRANK: G. RUFFIN, Editor. P. D. BERNARD, Publisher. Vol. XIV. RICHMOND,- APRIL, 1854. No. 4. For the Southern Planter. SCIENTIFIC AGRICULTURE. BY PROFESSOR GILHAM. NUMBER VII. (Continued from page 67, Vol. XIV.) DRAINING. At the close of our last number, after having enumerated the various evil effects resulting from the presence of too much moisture in the soil, we stated that there is but one effectual remedy for a wet soil, and that is thorough draining. Not that the removal of excessive moisture will necessarily make every soil productive, but such are the evil effects of too much Avater, that no wet soil, whether otherwise fertile or the reverse, can be properly improved until after it has been drained. By draining we do not mean the digging of a few open ditches around the fields or through the lowest portions of them, which would prove exceedingly objectionable in many ways, without accomplishing the object for which they were dug, but we mean the construction of a net work of covered or blind drains, as we have sometimes heard them called, which underlie the entire surface to be drained, placed so deep as not to be interfered with by the plough, and so arranged as to carry off all water except that which the retentive power of the soil enables it to keep within its pores. We have already stated that a soil, to be in the best possible condition with respect to moisture, must rest upon a porous subsoil, or be so inclined to the horizon, that any excess of moisture, whe- ther derived from rains, or higher lands, shall pass rapidly from it; when, from the nature of the sur- face, the position of the strata which underlie the soil, or the retentive nature of the subsoil, there is not a free passage for excessive moisture, the drain is the only means that we can resort to to remedy the defect. Now, since there are comparatively few soils which are in the condition first mentioned, it follows that there are few soils which would not be more or less improved by thorough draining. At the same time we may say that draining be- comes absolutely necessary only when the excess of moisture becomes so great as to prove a bar to pro- fitable cultivation. In proportion as the value of lands increase, from whatever cause, or in propor- tion as population increases by which the necessity Vol. XIV.— 4. for increased productiveness becomes greater, so does the necessity for increased attention to the subject of drainage become greater. In Great Bri- tain large areas have been drained, but it does not follow from that that we would be justified at this time in draining to the same extent; on the con- trary, we feel assured that an extensive system of draining in Virginia, if undertaken at this time, would be the height of folly. But while we would not at present recommend draining upon an exten- sive scale, we would recommend every farmer to examine his farm well, to ascertain whether he hay not a few acres, at least, which are now useless, or nearly so, from being too wet. If he finds any such land, let him ascertain what would be the probable expense of draining it, and then let him compare this expense with what he knows must be the in- creased productiveness of the land after it is drained. There are but few farmers who will not find some land that needs draining. After what was said in our last number in rela- tion to the effects of too much moisture in the soil, the benefits of the drain must be apparent to every one; it may not be amiss, however, briefly to cali attention to some of them. Land that has been drained well never retains any- stagnant water upon it; neither will the water from washing rains run off over the surface, carrying off the very best portions of the soil ; but it will ra- pidly sink down into the soil, carrying with it what- ever fertilizing substances it has taken from the air; and as it sinks, itnvill be followed by air and warmth. As the water sinks rapidly through the soil to the drains, the latter is much sooner under the beneficial influence of air and warmth than if it had not been drained ; and it is also sooner in the proper condition for ploughing or any other needful mechanical operation; while in times of drought it never bakes or becomes hard, as un- drained lands frequently do. Crops upon drained land generally ripen earlier than upon undrained, and they ripen more uni- formly, while winter crops are less liable to be fro- zen out. Draining, besides ameliorating the condition of the surface soil, produces very beneficial effects upon the subsoil. It is made lighter; is more rea- dily worked, and the roots of plants penetrate it more readily; besides, as the water sinks through it air follows, producing those changes which are always so beneficial, and which fit it for the supply of healthy nourishment to the roots of #uch plants as penetrate it. But the beneficial effects of the drain upon both soil and subsoil are far greater THJbi ' s U T H E 11 fl ^LIN TER? wneu deep vij I oil ploughing are resorted to in connection I it; indeed, we may say that in most cases of thorough draining the subsoil plough should be used as a matter of course, and should be regarded as necessary to complete the improve- ment that it is designed to effect in draining. After what has already been said in relation to deepening the soil, its effects, and the utter fruitlessness of attempting it on a wet soil, it is unnecessary to dwell upon the benefits resulting from the use of the subsoil plough in connection with the drain; we would remark, however, that as there are com- paratively few subsoils which have good natural drainage, there are also, comparatively, few soils which are benefited by the use of the subsoil plough until after they have been thoroughly drained. Soils that have been drained are found to resist drought better than undrained ones; the subsoil having been made lighter the roots of plants pene- trate farther in search of necessary moisture, and for the same reason the supply of water which is brought up by capillary attraction to replace that removed by evaporation is greater and lasts longer. Pasture lands frequently contain portions upon Avhich only the coarser grasses will grow — grasses which are not nutritious, and which stock will not touch until all the finer grasses have been eaten off — these portions suffer from an excess of mois- ture. One of the first effects of draining upon such lands is the disappearance of the coarse herbage and the substitution of the finer and more nutri- tious grasses in its stead. But though little is known yet in relation to the -practical benefits of draining in this country, the few who have tried draining and have made known • iiheir experience, speak in the highest terms of its effects. In Great Britain large areas have been drained, and with the very best results. Drained lands havo their productiveness so much increased that landlords are enabled to raise their annual rents sufficient to yield them an interest of from five to seven fper cent, on the outlay for draining, and tenants find it to their advantage to pay the in- creased^ent for drained lands, rather than cultivate undramed ones. Cases have occurred in which the increased yield from the first crop covered the en- tire expense of draining. The 'drain has been found beneficial on almost every variety of soil, from the stiffest clay even to light,, sandy soils. Where failures have occurred they have been most freqifent in very stiff clays. Some very .-stiff clay subsoils will not permit the passage tot water through them at all, or at most to awery slight degree. Such soils would not drain no matter (how 'dose the drains were placed to each other. &t has sheen recommended that before any attempt is made tto drain a very stiff soil, a hole or pit be dug,, in tit, and securely covered so that no water may enter from above, and then ascertain whether, in time K> 1* 4h O m 3 s | £ 0) 53 u en £j T3 53 03 s- fa 0) ,5 53 © o ^ D a o a> t» A co 1 -t3 o C3 53^ © 53 O co bC^3 .a 2 © © &1 v&s£*\ )i2 0} jeaqAv CM K 00 co to in m O CM CO CO CO 00 °* \ iS8I P UB 0281 CM CO ^h CM O zn ^ t3 CD JO a^C.T9AT3 p3.l9U9£) .^ CD ■ 4 IT5 U5 ^ £ O O t^ t^ 00 a co o» O CO Ol o as <2 M •-= o S 02 O o 2 00m O = r/, ! "d UO CO CB O -H co O) ■s tS - PL, OJ5 t2 CM E- 1 Ir— — ' c bx CD • fcJD g «5 CO £ 3 co in 00 « co DJ CO CO H O) CM ^3 o a co h j 1-1 "£J OOO OOO c~ CM Total of 7 farms, 10,932. i O DJ O 00 O r-t CO rf CM CM «0 00 ol •IS8I P" * 0S8T ipoq US O l-H t^ tO CO CO s JO 9.1012 oj aSBJt9Ay r-H O CN rH to CO -1 CM Ci CM O co CO- CD . o Q bD CD d O r- 1 £ o Oi » *pf CO CO CD C3 1-1 in to >n CO CM ^3 Ct I-H CM CM CM CO o ,-H X a co r ■-? . c St m 00 Total of 7 farms, 20,900. eg O i^ O i>. 00 in !0 2 a. O «b rrl CO CO l^ t^ ol m ca eo N «H TT co 93 :f s be p o l-H t^ !-h in to r O ■ to CO 2'|s CO. 5b CO 3 e o •" 3 CD -3 b r marl- and in esti- ated. to Pi o O U CO J£ ^ S. CD 3 o £ bCco « CO CM * CO SBAV §1 8qj 1IJ.IUUI u9q A v CD cm a a 00 00 co CM CO i-H 00 00 00 08* a ■0*81 ^q 10 i^ CO m LO CM t^ paprern [JOnUT MOJ-J CO CM CO -3 "3 t*, 5 'Of 9jqB.TB J -81 «! P U13 I Xnjuunf) in CM O CTi O r-C CM CO ■r £ M - C DG - en s nd, titains,^ A. Ma leigh, Marks Town, issell, irrison, gton,* arrison rd's* Ruffin fi's Poi s E 1 > id 1 3 E J. B. Bla (Fou Edward Bur John H. Old Elgin Ri R. M. Hj Huntin H.W. H Pinka Edmunc Coggi H I M CM CO rr" in" T 6 6 6 S5 S5 125 xz, z, z •o{) dSuoo*) douud ni i'W AV£ rH ,C3 © © fl m O *> « -^ c2 >%^ O CO O^ t^j r- g.£ 0: _ 00 <^ cj w ' , -e 2 cl£ 9^5 unfoi d wl r for rops 2^ •S © CC M ~ S 2 *~ "53 "S o o o 2 br ■ • 2 8 rg © "53 w « g^coco^-O > 53 o co 53 CJ X4 »S 2 lc§ ."S © s* C+-. T-l O o* o 09 O =3 "C 5|©|^| ?>^ -e 03 ^ o O M h M H co O A "3 © O „ — CO x S -a 2 093 » H 5: m ~ o. ^ C; - 03 r; O 6Cy s--3 33s-m S-c+3.. G^CO C4_--© ri^rG © — --=i o "-" O ^^l^^Sc)©^^"^ © o . ^ ^? ^ ° ^ © fl 2 P : 33 „ o © QU+* » o ^ to <~ t . © *S .2/ ^ * ^ J © ,0 ^ .53 O -g 1 Sis 8 o c o w - » ft £ « -2 £ £ _» co •nS33-5o^ 3 _-jC3^» cS S'^r! 5f3 r r3 t,-l !-i©co2 §<•§* a j 5 2 ~ 1 2 1 1* s w © S p g fo» c . gog ..S -^ * ©^ bC3^-2^ oi^5^ XC5 & ^ > Coft fc 5 < U H § 2 &2 2.g'^^ >'" - § THil fcJoU'l'kjsna I'jjffriTIiw. Which is rather more than 180 per cent, on the previous unimproved product. General average per acre of wheat, on six farms, (omitting No. 1,) for 1850 and 1851, ... - 11.88 (The culture in three shifts, and wheat following corn on five of the six farms.) Actual general product of wheat on six farms, omitting No. 1, for 1850, - 9,832 Same for 1851, - 10,G38 General increase of wheat crop of 1851 over estimate for 1840, (3950 bushels,) 6,688 Which is nearly 170 per cent, increase on the pro- duct of 1840. General increase of wheat crop of 1851, over estimate of total production on six farms before their marling was be- gun, (1358 bushels— 10,638,) - 9,280 Which is rather more than 680 per cent, increase on the early and unimproved product in wheat. It might be inducing a great error if I were to leave my readers to infer that all this increased production was on the same land, or that the space cultivated on each of these farms was the same from 1840 to 1851. On the contrary, and as is the case of almost every improving farmer in lower Virginia, each of these has more or less enlarged his cultivated space, by new clearings, or bringing again under culture waste and greatly impoverished ground, (including all the galled and gullied spots) previously left out if cultivation and use. In ad- dition, the first named three farms have been more or less increased in surface, by purchases of ad- joining poor land. But, in almost every case of such additions, whether by purchase, or by clear- ing of original forest, or bringing under culture before worn-out lands, these new additions were much poorer than the average quality of the land previously tilled; and of such additions (before being marled) served at first to increase the gross or total production of the farm, they served— -and mostly still serve — in greater proportion to lessen or keep down the average production to the acre, which is the main matter here in question. Thus, while the latest actual crops then known (1850 and 1851) averaged for the latter six of these farms only 23.39 bushels of corn and 11.88 of wheat to the acre, it is certain that some parts of these farms, originally very poor, and improved only by marl and their fair share of farm-made putrescent manures, (and in some cases without any other than their own growth,) are capable of making 30 or more bushels of corn, and 15 or more of wheat after corn, or 25 or more if after clover or pea fallow. But it may be truly asserted, that all the produc- tions of all ground added to these farms since their marling was begun substantially are as wholly due to marling as the mere increased product of the land kept before under usual tillage. Before this improvement was begun, not only much, but much more, land was annually added by new clearings to every farm; and, also, much better land, until all such was brought under culture. Still the extent of culture did not increase — or but little — because as much, or nearly as much, old land was annually turned out of culture as being exhausted and worth- less, as was added by new clearings. Since the marling no land has been turned out, and all new clearings remain as so much net increase to the extent of surface cultivated. Therefore, not only the increase of product, from being subsequently marled, of all new or added spaflcC^flMps^ '" ,1'A product, is all due to the improvem A *r jy marling. None of the farms mentioned were' selected in 1840, because showing the largest, or even proper increased products from marling ; and in 1852, when questions again were put, they were thus directed merely because the same persons had before an- swered in 1840. Other farmers who began to marl later, and on newer and more level lands, have done much better than the farmers above referred to, because of the unfavorable circumstances above named. As one case out of many of more recent and much greater improvement, I will cite the tes- timony of David Tatum, a respectable and reliable man, (though formerly a very unsuccessful and profitless farmer,) who, as he stated of himself, was always " going down hill " in his farming, not- withstanding all his efforts to improve, until he began to marl. His locality, in the interior of Prince George county, would alone forbid his ac- cess to other than farm-made manures ; and he has only used these with leaves from his wood land arid latterly marl. In answer to inquiries, this lat but very successful marler wrote (in 1852) as fo lows: "I commenced marling ten or twelve year ago. JVty average crop of corn at that time was not more than 10 bushels to the acre, and that was the principal crop made on the farm. _ In 1850 and 1851 my corn crops averaged at least 30 bushels and my wheat crops 20 bushels to the acre." Judging from his locality and the former and present conditions of his farming, and from the general usage of his neighborhood, I infer, that before marling Mr. Tatum made little or no wheat — owing to the then poverty of his land; and that now the culture of wheat is not extended (as is that of corn) over the still poorest part of every field, in its turn of tillage. The high rate of general increased Production from marling, stated in the last case, \Vas OAving to the absence of the most unfavorable circum- stances of all "the other farms previously named. Probably, on each one of these, if not all, (and I can vouch for No. 7) there have been obtained on portions of the space under tillage full as large products as those stated by Mr. Tatum, and with- out any advantage or aid not allowed by Mr. New- ton's requisitions. And if any portion of marled land, coming fully under the conditions required by his proposition, shows a continued or enduring production very much greater than the maximum rates he supposes, then the unsoundness of his view in this respect, as a general proposition, is as clearly made out as if such large products covered entire farms. Whatever has been done on even as much as 20 acres of suitable land, may be done on any greater space, or a whole farm, if of land equally suitable to being improved. The greatest production caused by marling, under all the con- ditions required by Mr. Newton's proposition, is the true measure of the effects and value of marl- ing ; and not the smaller or smallest benefit derived, more usually and on much larger spaces, where the circumstances of the land, or its management, are very unfavorable to the proper operations of the manure. So far, my remarks have been confined (with the small exceptions stated) to miocene marl on na- turally poor lands. Soils naturally rich, (however much exhausted by tillage,) and eocone marl con- taining much of fertilizing ingredients besides car- bonate of lime, were properly excluded from Mr. Newton's proposition. Therefore, the following re- a. xx i!J' \J\J V 1 Ikihli LS r Lt A. IN ± Jh 1\ . u. . „ isolated facts of greatly increased products, \^ eY bver valuable as agricultural facts and for instruction under like circumstances, are not presented here as additional evidence on the question of the difference of opinions stated. This case, the farm of Carter Braxton, Esq., was one of those embraced in the former report of 1840, and, therefore, with others, its later productions of 1850 and 1851, were sought and obtained. But as the farm is of originally good soil, (of Pamunkey flat land,) and has been entirely manured with eocene marl, containing important fertilizing ingredients other than the carbonate of lime, the case is not applicable to the foregoing question. The Newcastle farm, formerly belonging to Mrs. A. G. Ruffin, (now Mrs. Governor M'Donald of Georgia,) who first begun the marling in 18 — , and since to Carter Braxton, Esq., whose former and recent crops, from his own reports, furnished at my request, will be here stated : FARM OF CARTER BRAXTON, ESQ. Years. Bushels of Wheat. Bushels of Corn. Crops. Per acre. Crops. Per acre. 1839 412 5 1840 465 3 3705 18 1841 860 5.5 3325 20 1850 3382 10.5 6305 41 1851 3320 18 5310 35 1852 4400* 15* 7500f 50 REMARKS. * This crop much lessened by a fresh in April, which overflowed 60 or 70 acres. f This crop, stated by the proprietor's estimate or cubic measurement, before being shelled for sale. The wheat crop of 1853, not yet sold, is understood to be more than 5000 bushels. Formerly, (in 1839 to 1841,) about 15<}0 bushels of oats Were made annually, of which crop but little has been sowed in latter years. For the Southern Planter. APPLICATION OF GUANO TO CORN. Mr. Editor, — We find in the March number of the Planter a subscriber seeking information when and how guano should be applied to poor land for corn. You referred him to back numbers, and par- ticularly to a communication of Mr. Wilkinson, as published last spring, but said, in conclusion, that the usual mode practiced among you Avas to put about a tea-spoonful of guano to the hill of corn, sprinkling it on the hill and covering it with a little dirt, drop the corn on that and cover with a hoe. A very tedious process we think. The writer of the article seemed to be opposed to the broadcast application. The subject we con- sider an important one, and particularly at this season of the year when the crop is about to be planted. We, therefore, propose to notice briefly the method as suggested above, the writer's views, and, in conclusion, to give, as we think, a better plan. In the first place, we do not believe that a tea-spoonful of guano will make a good ear of corn on poor land, applied in any way whatever, much less do we believe it will do it when put in the hill, for the very simple reason that the stalk in a short time is not fed or supported from the roots in the hill, but from those in the row; and besides this it is certainly best for all kinds of manure to be mixed with the soil. We, therefore, disapprove of ma- nuring for corn, either in the hill or drill. The latter mode we tried last year, and had our brightest . hopes disappointed. The corn grew off beautifully at first, and bid fair to bring a fine yield, but as soon as the roots left the drill they missed the guano, and, of course, there was a decided surren- der in the crop, and that, too, in the very nick of time. But, sir, we consider it a partial way of ap- plying any manure on any land and at any time, and Avould suggest instead thereof either of two methods. The first is to sow the guano broadcast on the land before you plough it; and the second is to apply it when you run your harrows over the corn the second time; either of which is easier done, and is better for the crop and the land. Prince Edward. For the Southern Planter. EARLY WHEAT. . Mr. Editor, — I shall offer no apology for troubling you with the following reflections and facts, farther than may be found in a profound sense of the obli- gation I hold every man to rest under to contribute, as far as in him la*y, to the cause of agriculture. For the past five years I have observed that the most forward wheat on my farm, and generally on my neighbors', was always the best, provided, it was put in as well, and the land was equal in strength. I have noticed, also, that the fly inva- riably committed its depredations upon all wheat on lay farm, either in the fall or spring, in some years on the same field both spring and fall; and also, that very early wheat seemed to get over its effects by new lateral branches before the frost, and seemed to stand the winter freezing and heav- ing better than the later wheat, owing to the stronger roots which the earlier seeding possessed. The past fall I determined to test my impressions more fully. Having fallowed a field in June and July, on the 25th of August I commenced ploughing in on the fallow 3 bushels of guano (168 lbs.) and li bushels of wheat to the acre, in a drought. I suc- ceeded in putting in about 25 acres before it rained, on which, though the rain was light, it came up directly and grew finely, while I was engaged with the rest. The fallow was completed by the 15th of September. The grasshoppers were as plentiful as the locusts in Egypt, destroying the wheat entirely around the edges of the field, and grazing as a rabbit all over it, (all which they bite before the wheat opens its leaves is destroyed effectually — that which they graze down after branching, puts up again.) Very early in September I discovered that the fly was causing the wheat to disappear, and later, in October, it seemed to be dying daily. I paid some attention to their habits, &c. and found them by thousands depositing their eggs, saw the larva in all its stages, and was struck with the faithfulness of their history as furnished by the Farmers' Register. Of course I had painful ap- prehensions as to my seed wli-ccd and labor, though, as I had abundant time to resow, I feared no other loss, I determined, however, to go on with my corn land seeding, and watch farther develop- ment. During this period there had been no rain . farther than the slight one mentioned in the be- iiilBUI IIP THE SOUTHERN PLANTER. ginning of my seeding. Now, however, we had several fine ones, and, to my astonishment and de- light, every bunch of wheat which I thought ef- fectually killed, shot forth new branches abun- dantly, and grew most rapidly — so rapidly that, fearing the frost, I had to put my cattle, horses and sheep upon it. They soon nipped its pruriency, and were removed, with the exception of the sheep ; they remained until the 26th of February. The wiieat at present looks remarkably strong, covering the ground with numberless branches. What the ultimate result may be is not for me to say, but I think any one viewing my field would choose the ■very early seeding in preference to the later ; in- deed, I see nothing to fear at present except a se- vere late frost ; and as the land is wet and stiff, lying in a cold situation on the Potomac, it will not be so liable to that calamity as if on lighter land and in a warmer lafitude. I will inform you of the final result, and if at harvest the yield should correspond with present promising prospects, it will produce a new era in wheat raising, and add another trophy to the miraculous power of guano. Respectfully your friend, Wat H. Tyler. Wilton, Westmoreland, March 1, 1854:. We shall be glad to hear from our correspondent on the subject of his harvest, or on any other that he may favor us with. — Ed. So. Planter. For the Southern Planter. SMUT IN WHEAT. Mr. Editor,— In looking over the columns of the Southern Planter, I read with pleasure the very in- teresting letter of Mr. Thomas Meaux on the sub- ject of smut; and as he requested that farmers should compare notes on this subject, in order to benefit their brother-farmers, in coming to some effective means lo eradicate this prevailing evil, I have concluded to give you the result of my expe- riments on wheat in the fall of 1852. In September I selected four bushels of wheat, and cleaned it thoroughly for the purpose of making the following experiments: Lot No. 1. One bushel of wheat sowed without either brining or liming, with one hundred and fifty pounds of Peruvian guano to the acre. The yield, thirteen bushels, had the smul very bad. Lot No. 2. One bushel, brined and limed, and sowed with one hundred and fifty pounds of Peru- vian guano. Yield, fifteen bushels per acre. This lot had some little smut, but nothing like as bad as No. 1, which I think lost two bushels in smut. Lot No. 3. One bushel brined, but not limed, and sowed with one hundred and fifty pounds of Peru- vian guano. Yield, ten bushels. About one-third of this lot was smut. Lot No. 4. One bushel washed in clear spring water, and then limed, sowed with one hundred and fifty pounds of guano. Yield, eighteen bushels. — This lot did not have the smut at all. On all these lots the wheat was the same: the growth equally as vigorous on them all. The result of my experiments is, as will be seen, in favor of the lime. The spring water was only used to wet the grains in order to make the lime adhere to them. I think that if farmers would take more pains in getting out their seed wheat, viz. thresh it out with a slow pressure, clean it well, and spread it over their barn floor thinly, and then sow =- lime over the floor, stir it up togeth'^ 1 ^ y^ orou „ s . main there until seeding time: then wash in clear spring water, lime it, and sow when the ground is in good order, they will be able to get clear of the smut. With my best wishes for your success in improv- ing Virginia agriculture, George H. Northam. Woodbine, Westmoreland, Nov. 8, 1853. For the Southern Planter. THE MAINE LIQ.UOR LAW. Mr. Editor,— I am induced after a personal inter- view with you yesterday, to say that as you have admitted into your columns a long article on this subject, written by Mr. Jesse Hargrave of Sussex co., Va., in which he most wantonly assails and abuses the advocates of the Temperance reformation — ma- ny of whom are among the most respectable citizens of Virginia — and as you now find it necessary to close your columns against any reply — the writer desires to say to Mr. Hargrave, as he has made the attack where we are not allowed to go, and as he boldly says "This subject must be met at its thresh- hold"— he is hereby challenged to select as his me- dium of discussion any paper published in Virginia, and we do hope as an honorable gentleman he will accept the challenge and give us notice at an early day, and he is hereby promised a full. reply to his article in the Planter, and a full and fair discussion of the subject to any reasonable extent: and if we cannot maintain our cause before an enlightened and intelligent community when submitted to their judgment, then we must submit to Mr. Hargrave's anathemas and all the woes his "good creature" brandy can bring upon us. All we ask is to submit it to the people and not to be ruled by '-'Jive [Brandy] counties." W. Tjmeerlake. Carter's Bridge P. O. Albemarle, Dec. 9lh, 1853. REPORT ON SUNNYSIDE FARM. The following account of Mr. Sayre's farming is very instructive and well worth attention. He is the only one of those who took an honorary testi- monial who complied at the time with the require- ments of the Schedule of Premiums. None have done so since. When they do, none, we venture to say, will equal the results of Mr. Say re, and no county w r ill come up to his in the profits of " truck- ing," as it is called. Sunnyside Farm, belonging to, and residence of William Sayre, situated on the south side and at the mouth of the western branch of the Elizabeth river, four miles from Portsmouth by land, and the same distance from Norfolk by water, contains 149 acres — 107 arable — 42, w r ood and waste. The soil varies from light sandy, to moderately stiff. It was formerly very poor, but at this time about one-half of the arable land is very produc- tive, and was made so by repeated and heavy ma- nuring for the last ten years, at an annual expense of about one thousand dollars. The subsoil varies very much, from sand to red and blue clay — and is from nine to eighteen inches below the surface. The red clay is found in the field next to the river, but is not in a regular stratum underlying the THE SOUTHERN PLANTER proaucts, 1 ^ L*Xi many places the subsoil is sand, then clay, varying from one to the other several times in one or two hundred yards. The rest of the subsoil is blue clay. Of the arable land there are in regular annual tillage about one hundred acres. The remaining seven acres are attached to the homestead and three small tenements. The principal manure used is the best stable manure, purchased in Baltimore and delivered here at an expense of SI 12£ per cart load of twenty bushels. Night soil, guano, charcoal and marsh muck have also been used, but only to a limited extent. For 1853 the crops were peaches and green ve- getables, viz. peas, cucumbers, tomatoes, Irish po- tatoes, cymblines, snap beans and asparagus. Peaches — 5000 trees on 46 acres. This orchard is generally ploughed twice a year, and this year 17 acres were sown in extra early garden peas, in rows four feet apart, three rows of peas to each space between the rows of trees. In addition to these 17 acres were 21 acres in peas, sown in rows seven feet apart, one bushel of seed to the acre. Time of planting from first of January to first of March. Time of gathering from first of May to first of June. Manures used guano and stable manure. On 16 acres of the land sown in peas were cu- cumbers also planted — the peas' and cucumbers being in alternate rows. The time for planting this crop is generally the first of April, replanting every ten days until the frosts are over. 400 loads of stable manure were put in the drills opened for this crop. On 4 acres of the land sown in peas were planted cymblines, and on one acre, snap beans, in alternate rows, as the cucumbers. Time and mode of plant- ing the same as cucumbers. On 22 acres were tomatoes, in hills six feet by four. The plants were raised iii frames and under glasses. The seed were sown in smaller frames about the middle of January — transplanting to larger frames about the 10th of March, and as soon as the frosts are gone, from the larger frames to the field, generally from the 15th of April to the 1st of May. For this crop there were two hundred loads of stable manure used in the hill. On 7 acres were Irish potatoes planted in rows 3£ feet apart, forty bushels of seed to the lot. This crop was manured in the drill — first six hundred pounds of guano to the acre, in drills six inches deep, which was covered three inches deep with the soil. The pieces of potatoes were placed from six to nine inches apart in the row, and well co- vered with a compost of hog-pen manure and marsh muck, about thirty loads to the acre ; then over this compost was thrown the dirt with the plough.* All of these crops are worked with the plough, cultivator and hoe, as corn and other crops planted in rows — the only difference being in more frequent cultivation. Regular force employed, eight men, four black and four white. For gathering peas, eighty women and children, day laborers. For peaches, one hundred and thirteen women at fifty cents per day and seventeen men at one dollar per day. For other crops, from five to thirty, at thirty- seven and a half cents per day. These hands all * There are four acres in asparagus. The roots are now ten years old, and were planted in drills three feet apart, and at the depth of one foot. This crop is worked with the plough and cultivator. come from Portsmouth each morning and return in the evening ; they bring their meals with them. Estimate for 1853 of Capital vested in Sunnyside Farm. Land, 107 acres arable, 42 wood and waste — total, $7,600 00 400 00 200 00 600 00 500 00 500 00 50 00 100 00 25 00 75 00 149— cost Hot beds and sash, Repairs to farm buildings, One boat, - Six hundred boxes, Four horses, - Two cows, - Carts and wagon, - Corn sheller, hommony mill and straw cutter, - Ploughs, harrows, cultivators and har- ness, - - -'• ' - Hand utensils, hoes, spades and shovels, forks, rakes, &c. Twenty-five hogs, - Four hundred barrels, Cucumber and cymbline seed, Total capital, - - - $10,400 00 In the foregoing estimate each article is valued at what it is supposed it would sell for — in some instances not one-half of the original cost. Expenses of Cultivating , Gathering and Shipping Crops for 1853. 150 00 50 00 100 00 Day labor, - Regular force, hire and support, 800 loads stable manure, 6199 lbs. guano, 38 bushels seed peas, (English,) 40 bushels Irish potatoes, 1 bushel snap beans, 1500 barrels, 1000 yards cotton cloth for barrel covers, 150 baskets lost during the season, - 105 fruit boxes lost during the season, 2 kegs of nails, - Farming utensils lost and worn out, Blacksmith's and carpenter's bills, - Total, .... Amount of Sales for 1853 of Fruits ant in the Baltimore, Philadelphia, and markets. $922 49 1,149 00 900 00 139 48 228 00 28 00 6 00 270 00 57 50 43 40 84 00 11 00 25 00 41 00 $'3,904 87 Gross sales. Asparagus, 25 boxes, con- taining 762 bunches, $234 46 Peas, 742 barrels, 2,351 47 Beans and cymblines, 171 barrels, - - 298 89 Potatoes, 88 barrels, - 217 88 Cucumbers, 643 barrels, - 2,365 80 Tomatoes, 186 boxes, - 863 49 Peaches, 1006 boxes, - 3,997 93 Hay, 6200 lbs. Amount of sales in New York not yet received, 200 00 I Vegetables New York Net, after deducting freight and commissions. $197 20 1,924 14 193 80 178 66 1,875 86 694 59 3,203 96 77 50 150 00 Total, - - - $10,529 92 $8,495 71 Expenses of cultivating, gathering and , shipping crops, - - - 3,904 87 Net profits, - $4,590 84 -, THE SOUTHERN PLANTER REMARKS UPON THE CROPS. Asparagus— a,n average crop — tied in bunches, six inches in diameter, and shipped in boxes hold- ing three bushels each. Peas — an average crop — shipped in flour barrels covered with cotton cloth. Cymblines and Snap Beans — an average crop — shipped in barrels. Potatoes — almost an entire failure, not more than one-third of a crop — shipped in barrels. Cucumbers — not more than half a crop — shipped in barrels. Tomatoes — not more than one-fourth of a crop — 464 boxes have been gathered before from half the same number of plants — shipped in boxes, three bushels each. The three last named crops were much injured by excessive drought, followed by excessive rains. Peaches — a large crop, but from continued rains one-half rotted on the trees, and those that were shipped reached the markets in very bad order. Persons who are considered good judges and who saw the crop, estimated the loss to be upwards of four thousand dollars. This orchard has borne a crop every other year for the past six years. William £5ayres. State op Virginia : County of Norfolk, ss. This day personally appeared before me, a jus- tice of the County and State aforesaid, William Sayre, and made oath that the within statement is true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief. Given under my hand this 27th day of October, 1853. Ge. W. Grice, J. P. MORGAN HORSES. Mr. Jewett, the most reliable authority on such matters, thus speaks of the Morgan horse: " I believe the Morgan blood to be the best that was ever infused into the 'Northern horse.' They are well known, and are esteemed for activit} r , hardihood, gentleness and docility, throughout the New England States ; well adapted for all work; good in every spot, except for racers on the turf. They are lively and spirited, lofty and elegant in their actions, carrying themselves gracefully in the harness. They have size proportioned to height; bone clean, sinewy legs, compactness, short strong backs, powerful lungs, strength and endurance. A mixture of the Morgan blood, though small, may be easily known from any other stock in the country. There is a remarkable similarity prevailing in all this race. They are known by their short clean heads, wide across the face at the eyes ; eyes lively and prominent; open and wide in the under jaws, large wind pipe, deep brisket, heavy and round in the body, broad in the back, short limbs in proportion to the size, broad quarters, a lively quick action, indomitable spirit, move true and easy in a good round trot, fast on the walk. Color, dark bay, chest- nut, brown, with dark flowing wavy mane and tail ; head up, moves without a whip ; about fifteen hands high ; action powerful and spirited. " They are highly celebrated for general useful- ness, make the best roadsters, and live to a great age. In fact they are the perfect ' Yankee harness horse.' " The Morgans are very like the noble Arab, with similar eyes, upright ears, high withers, powerful — m^ quarters, hocks well under theii Mug/it, vigorous arms and flat legs, short from the knee to the pas- tern, close jointed, possessing immense power for their size, with great fire and courage. But few of the Morgans, however, evince extraordinary speed." For the Southern Planter. STUCCOING HOUSES. Mr. Editor, — In a southern climate and damp location will stuccoing a twelve inch wall in a brick dwelling be a sufficient protection from dampness % Or is it better, with the stuccoing to have the in- side furred and lathed before plastering'? Infor- mation on the above point is desired for practical purposes by ALIQ.UIS. The above question is answered in the following letter from one of the best builders and most re- liable men we know : Eastern View, Albemarle, April 2, 1854. Frank: G. R-uffin, Esq.. Sir, — On the receipt of your note of the 29th ultimo, with the enclosed letter, I hasten to reply, requesting me to give you my opinion relative to the interrogatories sought for in said letter. This I will do with pleasure, and more cheerfully, from the fact that my long acquaintance, observation and interest, as a builder, has afforded me some practi- cal knowledge in guarding against dampness in brick walls, &c. Therefore, I would advise all buildings below the ground (cellar walls) to be hollow drained by an exterior wall four inches, or half a brick thick, to be run all round the cellar walls, (outside of course,) leaving a hollow space between the exterior and cellar walls four inches wide, commencing from the foundation and to be closed at the surface of the ground with bricks, projecting over against the cellar walls. Then a drain, leading from said hollow space, to carry off any water that may rise in the cellar from long and continued rains, filling the earth with water, not- withstanding this is the case sometimes. But if the water is carried off with a drain as it may rise, the walls of the cellar will remain perfectly dry, using this necessary and important precaution, not to suffer the water that falls on the roof of the building to be dashed or blown against the walls by wind, which is the case if it is not conducted off as it falls on the roof by suitable gutters and downfalls, with basins to catch the water, and then a gutter of wood or stone to take away from the wall, (ten or twelve feet, or more, is best.) An- other very important item to be particularly at- tended to for the dryness, &c. of brick buildings, is, not to suffer the guttering of the roofs, &c. to get out of order, which is frequently the case during summer (from neglect) by birds' nests and leaves deposited by the wind, obstructing the passage of the water, causing the gutters to overflow and sa- turating the walls with rain. Whenever this hap- pens the evaporation of the moisture is so gradual that it takes a long time for them to dry. I have long since come to the conclusion that twelve inch walls, one brick and a half thick, is sufficient protection against moisture when the work is executed in a workmanlike manner and good materials used, and the guttering, &c. at- tended to as recommended. I have been the occu- X ±1 tt SUUTMEHIN ¥ h A JN X E K . pant of 'SJmV aings for upwards of fifty years, and never have been molested or made uncom- fortable by damp walls in the upper stories of buildings by the falling of rain blowing against the walls. Yet this may happen in long and heavy rains blowing from the same point; for instance, a northeaster, if the building is not guttered and spouted. I have lived at my present location for about seventeen years, where my buildings are all of brick, without ever discovering any dampness in the walls above the ground, which have been always perfectly dry and comfortable ; and some- what remarkable to say, with a family, including white and black, of from thirty to thirty-five, not one has ever contracted a fever here of a protracted kind. But I will come to the point of a stuccoed building, and close by remarking, stucco of itself is nearly impervious to water, which much depends on the workmanship and the materials; for instance, the sand entirely divested of all loam and trash, by washing; the lime pure and slaked in what is called a putty state, then mixed properly with the sand, made into a mortar and suffered to stand some time before using, say from five to six weeks. When the work is commenced, the stucco work- man to use a plenty of elbow grease, by much rub- ^with a hand float, brush and water which compresses all of the particles of lime and sand closely together, and will make them ulti- mately become nearly as hard as rock. Conse- quently, I think you may safely answer "Aliquis," he need not (although the location of his building is a damp one) apprehend any danger from damp walls, particularly as he designs stuccoing them. Very respectfully, your obedient servant, W. B. Phillips. For the Southern Planter. AGRICULTURAL NOTICE. The following farmers have offered or con- • sented to act as Assistant Agricultural Com- missioners : Col. P. St. Geo. Cocke, of Powhatan, (Pres. Va. S. A. Society.) Thomas L. Preston, Esq., of Smyth. B. Johnson Barbour, Esq., of Orange. John R. Edmunds, Esq., of Halifax. Richard Irby, Esq., of Nottowa}*. These assistants will act, to such extent as they may be enabled by the-facilities afforded, and other circumstances, in their respective counties, and as much of the adjacent ground as it may be convenient to embrace. Each one, on his assigned ground for operations, will have equal powers and privileges, and like du- ties with the chief Commissioner. One service, and the most important which these Assistants will attempt, will be the mak- ing and reporting surveys of the agriculture of their respective counties, upon the general plan, of which the heads were recently pub- lished in the Richmond Dispatch, and are here- with annexed. Some other gentlemen have under consideration the undertaking of this useful service, for other counties. It is very desirable to have capable persons to undertake this and other of the duties of Assistant Com- missioners, in other agricultural regions — as the tide-water region, the Valley, and the north- * west part of Virginia. Should an}' public- spirited and suitable persons offer to perform these services, they will be gladly added to the list of Assistant Commissioners. Edmund Ruffin, Agricultural Commissioner. VIRGINIA STATE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. [Report of the Agricultural Commissioner to the Execu- tive Committee. Approved and ordered to be printed, March 24th.] GENERAL PLAN AND ARRANGEMENT, AND SOME OF THE PARTICULAR SUBJECTS, SUGGESTED FOR A REPORT OF AN AGRICULTURAL SUR- VEY OF A COUNTY, OR ANY OTHER AGRI- CULTURAL DISTRICT OR SECTION OF VIR- GINIA. I. General features a?id cliaracter of the country in the following respects: 1. Situation, extent, and natural physical characters and divisions, illustrated by a map of small size. 2. Surface and face of the country, and di- versities of elevation and exposure. 3. Climate, and especially any peculiarities thereof, and the causes. 4. Geological characters of different parts, so far as known. 5. Useful minerals, and especially such as are, or may be, valuable as manures. 6. Water, in reference to uses of navigation, irrigation, propelling machinery, &c. 7. Market towns, and manner of, or facili- ties for transportation of products. II. General description and management of lands. 1. Classes and kinds of soil, and of subsoil, to be designated (when extensive) on the map. 2. Quantities of arable land, of meadow, (not subjected to ordinary tillage, or rotation of crops,) of wood land, swamp or marsh, and other waste or unproductive lands. 3. Sizes of farms, usual or unusual. 4. The usual crops, of large and of small culture. 5. Rotation of crops. 6. Manner and depth of ploughing, and pre- paration for and tillage, and general manage- ment of crops. 7. Expense of cultivation. 8. Agricultural products proper to be made in the locality, and which are brought from other places, and the extent of such supplies. III. General market prices of lands, jmst and present, and causes of rise or fall in prices. Rates of rent. T JUL HAJLT.HJIJLN PLANTED IV. Drainage and Embankments. I 1. Of tide marshes, and swamps. 2. Of swamp or other low and wet lands, higher than the tide. 3. Drainage of arable, or high and firm lands, for either surface water or springs, and by either open or covered drains. V. Implements and Machines for Agricul- tural operations. VI. Fencing and Enclosing. 1. Kinds and costs of fencing. 2. Advantages and disadvantages of the se- parate enclosing of each field, or each farm, compared to dispensing with either or both— and instead, confining live stock to enclosed pastures, or herding them, especially in refer- ence to hogs. VII. Grass husbandry, grazing, and green or vegetable manuring crops. 1. Natural Meadows on moist ground. 2. Artificial (or sown) grasses on permanent meadows or pastures. 3. Artificial grasses, peas, or other green or forage crops, alternated with tillage crops on arable land. 4. Mowing and hay. 5. Crops of grass, peas, or weeds, left to manure the land on which they grew. VIII. Live Stock. 1. Teams, or animals for labor. 2. Animals reared and kept for their pro- ducts, or fattened for sale or home consump- tion, and their management. 3. Animals purchased from abroad, and ge- neral cost thereof. 4. Comparative profits of hogs confined to enclosed pastures, or to sties, and those rang- ing at large. IX. Dairy management and products. 1. Products consumed or sold. 2. Supplies of butter and cheese from abroad. X. Manures. 1. Cow-yard and stable manure, and other stock supplies. Collection and choice of ma- terials—preparation, application, and effects. Fermented or unfermented manures. 2. Straw, leaves, or other unmixed vegeta- ble matters, unrotted when applied. 3. Peat, marsh or swamp mud, as manure. 4. Fossil shells or marl. 5. Lime. 6. Any supply of carbonate of lime from other sources. 7. Wood ashes — coal ashes. 8. Bone dust, or phosphate of lime in other materials. 9. Gypsum. 10. Guano. 11. Any earths contar ^T^oSt dients, and fit for manures. • 12. Any other neutral salts, or materials containing them, useful for manuring. 13. Composts of different manuring mate- rials. XI. Orchards and their products, Vine- ( yards, Vegetable Gardens supplying products for sale generally and extensively. XII. Wood-land. ). General description of the growth of dif- ferent kinds of lands. 2. Uses and value of timber and other pro- ducts. 3. Proportion of farms necessary to be kept under wood. 4. Disadvantages and cost of excess of wood- land to agriculture. XIII. Old and bad practices, and new or recently introduced processes or ionpn'oved prac- tices in agriculture. XIV. Notices or suggestions of new or neglected resources for agricultural improve- ment. XV. Obstacles to agricultural improvement and profit. 1. Obstacles opposed by natural and una- voidable circumstances. 2. Obstacles caused by erroneous govern- mental policy, or by omission of proper legis- lation. 3. Obstacles caused by individual action or neglect. XVI. Unhealtfdness of residents, caused by climate and condition of the country and its agriculture. 1. Local sources of malaria, their extent, operation and degrees of malignity— such as rapid streams sometimes overflowing the bor- dering land — tide-water marshes, fresh or sa lt_swamps, whether in their natural state or when under culture — mill-ponds, and the passage of transient and irregular floods of fresh water over salt marshes. 2. Accumulation of putrifying matters, ani- mal and vegetable, in towns, their injurious ef- fects on health, and the means of rendering them innoxious, and useful as materials for manure. 3. Increase or decrease, and greater or less extent and virulence of malarious diseases, in past time and now, and the supposed causes of change. • ...... 4. Means of removing or diminishing the causes of such diseases, within the reach of individual proprietors, and such means as can- not be used without governmental interposi- tion, and compulsory direction. XVII. Any other subjects not here indi- THE SOUTHERN PLANTER c^»srs^ v;jl ^ connected with the agri- , J jf the county or other lo- cality treated of, and of ivhich the discussion would be useful in aid of improvement. From the American Farmer. • SAVING CLOVER SEED— ECONOMY IN THE USE OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY. As requested at our recent interview, I will briefly give my "mode of harvesting clover seed with the mowing machine, and also the manner of preparing the seed for market." I will also add a few remarks as to the decided economy to farmers, of machine over hand work, in securing our crops. A large portion of my crop of clover seed the past season was so fallen and lodged, that scarcely half the seed could be saved with the cradle; consequently, we were compelled to re- sort to the slow and expensive mowing with scythes, or use the machine. The trial with cradles, resulted in breaking out the fingers, and leaving much of the best seed uncut; the scythe was both too slow and too wasteful. Indeed to look over the fallen and tangled mass of vegetation, persons unacquainted with the . machine would have supposed it impossible to cut it clean, with any thing short of the scythe. The machine (one of Hussey's improved) was set to cut rather higher than for mowing and by a side delivery of my own construction, the seed was delivered at the side and out of the track, in straight loose bunches in the best possible order for curing and taking up after- wards : and with almost the precision of clock work. It was one of the most beautiful and perfect farm operations I ever saw — scarcely leaving a head standing to the acre, and lite- rally leaving nothing for the rake to glean af- terwards. It was completely cut and raked in about one-third the time the same hands could have properly raked it alone. "We would occasionally, though not often necessary, throw out of gear, pass on through the cleared track, and only cut across and against the lean; in this way every head raised up four to five inches high, or above the guards, [snakes heads included,] was not only cut, but saved on the platform. ^ We could well afford to lose a little time in this way, when the machine was doing the work of full ten to a dozen scythes. The seed is usually left from five to ten days in this state, in order to make it hull more rea- dily; and a shower or two on it, improves it both for the threshing and hulling operations. At a leisure time in winter, and in cold dry weather, we pass it through the common wheat thresher to separate the heads from the straw. I If in good order for threshing, the spike con- caves are removed, and blank ones substituted in their places, which answer a better purpose- avoids cutting up the straw, and rendering the raking much less tedious. The next operation is the hulling; this is done either by running it two or three times through the same machine (spike concaves re- placed) as fast as it can be forced in by a board fitting the opening, and having a short handle m the centre, fifteen or eighteen inches long. It is then fanned, when the unhulled seed, fall- ing near the fan, and being much reduced in bulk, may all soon be hulled by passing four or five times through the machine; or second- ly, by an opening to feed in the front of the thresher, about nine or ten inches wide, and another opening at back, at the opposite end of the cylinder, the chaff passing diagonally through : but this plan, without much care, is very apt to cut or break too much seed; nei- ther does it save much time, as the feeding is necessarily slow. An efficient machine that will hull and fan at the same operation is a great gain; for the hulling alone is a short job compared to the fanning. I used a hulling machine this year for experiment, instead of the thresher, (with- out fan attachment,) but lost considerable seed; perhaps a^ bushel or more from cutting the seed It is a tedious, and very annoying ope- ration from dust, to hull with the thresher and fan afterwards; but all the portable clover ma- chines with fan, that I have seen, cost from $75 to $100, — too expensive for general use, and often cutting the seed. I am satisfied, however, after some years experience with the crop, that an efficient and durable machine with fan, may be made for about half the money. My crop of seed this season on seventeen acres, yielded forty-three bushels cleaned and ready for market: besides sowing a large cart load of partially hulled chaff, not considered at the time worth hulling over, but proved af- terwards by hulling a similar lot, to contain from three pecks to a bushel of seed; without close attention, considerable loss may occur in throwing out the chaff, or sowing the seed too thick, in the chaff. The crop at the present market value, is worth near $300; and did not cost me, all expenses included, over $15 to $20; two-thirds to three-fourths of this, is chargeable to the in-door work. The average yield on so many acres is rather unusual; the more so, as over half the ground had produced two crops of grass, and on seve- ral acres of this the clover seed was quite light. I attribute it to two causes; first, to the liberal use of lime; for without it, the yield would "Villi Ui« PHP, SOTITHTilRN P f \ A M T P P THE SOUTHERN Jf L A jS ± .& ±t . not have been a peck of seed to the acre; at least the land never produced any to my know- ledge, previous to my liming; nor in fact half a crop of any thing else for me, except briars, broom sedge and sassafras bushes. And what is quite as much to the purpose, this single crop of seed amply repays me for all the lime, bones, and other ^manures used in renovating the land. To judge by the general appearance of the crop, probably two-thirds of the seed, or some three to four bushels to the acre, was grown on about eight, of the seventeen acres; it being the first crop of seed, and having one hundred and fifty bushels of lime to the acre, in two applications; and on this portion of the land, doubling the lime has certainly more than doubled the product in grass and seed; — in fact, of nil the crops. And secondly, to the use of this most valuable implement, the mow- ing machine. In this crop of seed, and the grass crop, just preceding it, the saving was not less than $50 — I think more, and that it is susceptible of easy demonstration. To have secured the seed crop with the scythe, would have cost me one dollar an acre, besides the cost of hand raking; added to this, is the loss indeed from shattering off, and certainly not less than one peck to the acre, or four and a quarter bushels; equal to $50 in wages and loss of seed, before leaving the field. Now with the machine, two hands cut the whole in a day and a half, saving the raking entirely, and consequent loss; doing the work in from one-eighth to one-tenth part of the time, and doing it much more perfectly, and with materially less loss in seed, than was possible with the cradle or scythe, and rake. If "Poor Richard" said truly in his Alma- nac, that " a penny sa*ed is two pence clear," my case is nearly made out: but permit me to recur again to the grass crop on the same ground, and including two or three acres more than was cut for seed. This was much heavier by reason of the timothy, and even worse lodg- ed than the seed crop; generally estimated by those who saw it, to yield two and a half tons to the acre, or some forty-five to fifty tons. The whole was cut in about one and three- quarter days — it was cut by horses, raked by horses, and unloaded in the barn by horses, without oppression to man or beast, and with- out costing one a single dime for harvest wa- ges ; in fact, during the whole of the hay har- vest, we were short by one hand of what we often have hired at other times. Nor is this all; but for my machinery, probably half the crop would have been spoiled, or greatly less- ened in value; as owing to the dry weather the crops of grain and grass generally ripened at the same time, and the S not half equal to the demand. Besides secur- ing our own crops in fine order and in due sea- son, we had leisure to help out a neighbor or two; one of whom remarked, that if I could not cut his grass, or some eight or ten acres of it, he must leave it uncut, as he could not pro- cure hands. I am therefore satisfied that in the grass and clover seed crops alone, the past season, the machine has saved me fully half its cost ; to say nothing of any gain by its use in the grain crops, or the feeling of independence, and the satisfaction of having the work done at the proper time. The two past seasons, we have cut over one hundred and thirty acres of grass; two crops of wheat, and two of oats; quite sufficient I think to test fairly the merits, and to prove the economy of the mowing machine over the scythe, either on small or large farms. The machine has been carefully used, and has not cost twenty-five cents in repairs, for all this work. It has not been, as I have repeatedly seen Hussey's reaper, forced over stone heaps, pitched into gullies with the knives cutting through banks of earth, and all brought up standing by driving against rocks and stumps ; and to my amazement, when I expected a com- plete wreck, the machines were backed off with as little ceremony as an ox cart, the horses whipped into a trot, and the work resumed, as perfectly as if no impediment had occurred. : The great difiiculty with many who are dis- posed to use machines, is as to the best selec- tion, when so many new inventions and alleged improvements are being made. Without in- tending to detract from the merits of any, I will remark, that I visited the Crystal Palace at New York, last fall, mainly with the view to examine the many reaping and mowing ma- chines on exhibition. The result of my obser- vation was, for strength, durability, and effi- ciency as a combined machine, I saw none that was preferred to my own, improved as it now is. The reaper, however, is not considered complete, until hand raking is superseded by machinery, and delivering at the back or side at pleasure, and .without the reel; which is strongly objected to as cumbersome, very liable to get out of order, and shattering much grain when fully ripe. Whoever can effect this at the least cost, and most durability, will be well paid for his ingenuity and skill; as it will pro- bably be the means of introducing ten machines where one is now in use. With a scarcity of hands in harvest, it is at times very desirable to deliver the grain at the side; we now do it very satisfactorily with one yrrfjwFii^w n-AW:* nctiiuyit o.i Dri\^rU-^ oats, and light grain; but in heavy wheat, it should be done by machinery if practicable; and the more powerful muscles of the horse. I am fully aware of the difficul- ties attending it; but after seeing what has been done so successfully already in the cut- ting, I do not quite despair of the raking, al- though so many have attempted it, and failed. To succeed, the machinery must not be com- plicated, expensive, or liable to get out of or- der; nor must it materially affect or retard the free motion of the driving wheel and knives; to do either, will cause the latter to clog or choke, and occasion much detention, if not breakages. It must also be accommodated or adapted in some degree at least, to the con- stantly changing position of the grain, ground, wind, &c. In the opinion of many, Atkins' automaton self-raker has solved the problem of its practi- cability, under favorable auspices. As to the question, " Have you seen it at work, and will it meet or supply the wants of the farmer?" I would answer, that I have only seen the ma- chines on exhibition, and not in the field, where alone it can be judged of properly. It is an admirable piece of mechanism; but I fear too expensive an addition to the reaper, and proba- bly too complicated, to come into very general or common use, with a class not proverbial for mechanical tact and skili; or for "having a place for every thing, and every thing in its place." I have often seen expensive imple- ments, — and even the reaper, left in the field, "reposing on its laurels," exposed to all wea- thers, and from season to season. If the ma- chine fails in its allotted duty at a busy season, as fail it must with such, and even rougher usage, is it fair or just to lay the blame on the manufacturer? It certainly is not, but is oftentimes done notwithstanding. A practical experience of some twenty-live years, as a ma- chinist, has made me as familiar with machine- ry, as with farming; and I honestly express the opinion, that the sins of omission, by im- plement makers, are far less, than those of commission, by the ignorant and thoughtless who commonly use them. No subject connected with agricultural im- provement, has claimed so much of my atten- tion and interest for several years past, as per- fecting the reaping and mowing machine ; and substituting machinery for hand labor on the farm, wherever practicable. That I have suc- ceeded to some extent, — at least in saving money, I am perfectly satisfied. In reference to the machine raking, I may remark inciden- tally, that a working model has recently been submitted to me, and delivering at the side, that promises, ivith the reel, and under favor- ing circumstances, better than any thing I have yet seen; it can be made for $15 to $20 only, and perhaps as durable as other parts of the reaper. It requires however, to perfect it, in my opinion, to throw the rake forward, over, and into the uncut grain, like the hand rake, thus dispensing with the reel. The inventor thinks he can do this also ; but it can only be proved in the field, not the workshop; by an operating and efficient machine, not a model. There is however one thing that must be borne in mind by those who would use mowing machines to the best advantage : it is absolutely necessary to farm neatly, — to clear the ground from stone, stumps, and abrupt inequalities on the surface. For a farmer to expect to mow close and clean, without the trouble of picking up the stone, and with the knives cutting through earth and gravel, is about as reasona- ble, and as profitable too, as for a mechanic to undertake to plane up his boards covered with grit, or driven through with nails. I am, respectfully, Edward Stabler. Harewood, 2d month 15, '54. OSAGE ORANGE HEDGES. The following discussion, at a late Agricultural Convention in Ohio, will show how doctors differ ; "Major Milikin, of Butler county, offered for adoption the following resolution: " Resolved, That the State Board of Agriculture he recommended to offer premiums for the best specimens of, and the best mode of cultivating, Osage orange hedges. " Mr. Gamble advocated the passage of the reso- lution, detailing in a clear manner his experience in hedging, in a speech to which the audience lis- tened with much interest.* " Mr. Medary said he had given this subject con- siderable attention. He had reluctantly, almost come to'the conclusion that hedging was a species of enclosure, which was of doubtful economy. " Mr. Springer, on leave, addressed the Conven- tion five minutes, giving his opinion that Osage orange is an unprofitable and unsatisfactory mode of hedging, from his own careful experience. "Mr. McGrew replied, from his own experience, dissenting from the opinions of Mr. Springer, giv- ing his mode of cultivating the Osage orange, which had resulted to his satisfaction. It was his opinion that with proper attention, there is no soil in Ohio, upon which it cannot be satisfactorily cul- tivated. He plants in single rows. " Mr. Anderson stated that after four years' at- tention to this subject, he considered the Osage orange hedge a humbug. "Gen. Worthington said that he had had more than thirty years' experience in this matter, and he agreed with Mr. Anderson, that hedging was a humbug, because it would not pay. His observa- tion had begun with the white thorn hedge, which he deemed superior to any other kind. He was ■ miUU U»" TRlil SOUTHERN P T, A N" T F, TJ THE SOUTHERN PLANTER. satisfied that this species of enclosure would not reward the elaborate cultivation which was neces- sary in order to bring it to perfection, while our other ordinary modes of fencing could be followed with such cheapness, when compared with the trouble and expense of hedging. "Mr. Greene deemed the southwest of the State a little slandered. He had studied and practised on this subject twelve years, and was perfectly satisfied that it was one worthy the attention and efforts of agriculturists. We conceive, in Hamil- ton county, that it is far from being a humbug." THE SOUTHERN PLANTER. RICHMOND, APRIL, 1854. TERMS. One Dollar and Twenty-five Cents per annum which may be discharged by the payment of One Dollar only, if paid in office or sent free of postage within six months from the date of subscription. Six copies for Five Dollars ; thirteen copies for Ten Dollars, to be paid invariably in advance. ^ D° No subscription received for a less time than one year. H^* Subscriptions may begin with any number. H^*No paper will be discontinued, until all arrearages are paid, except at the option of the Publisher. J3f Office on Twelfth, between Main and Cary streets. ADVERTISEMENTS. A limited number will be inserted at the following rates: for each square of ten lines, first insertion, Si— each continuance, 75 cents. Advertisements out of the city must be accompanied with the mo- ney, to insure their insertion. p. d. b. POSTAGE ON THE PLANTER, When paid quarterly or yearly in advance. To any part of the United States one cent and a half per quarter, or six cents per annum. l£lr It is indispensably necessary that subscribers or- dering a change, should say from what to what post office they wish the alteration made. It will save time to us and lose none to them. NOTICE. f£jf*If subscribers do not order a discontinuance of the Planter before the commencement of a new year, or vo- lume, it will be considered as a renewal of their subscrip- tions, and they will be charged accordingly. CflliOlU NECESSITY OF GOOD STOCK" ? i VIRGINIA FARMERS, AND HOW THEY MaY GET IT. In the February number of the Planter we wrote a short editorial on the above subject, and promised to continue it in March; but we were disappointed in getting some facts, very material as confirming by experience one or two positions we wished to enforce, which had been promised us by two gentle- men, who have failed to comply up to this time when we are compelled to resume the subject. It is not necessary to recapitulate any part of it, but we may be allowed to refer to the very able prize essay of Commodore Jones as demonstrating by facts coming within his own knowledge the views we expressed in regard to the use of guano. (See page 46 of the February number of the Planter.) We need not cite statistics to prove that the lands of Tide Water and Piedmont Virginia, with every advantage of climate and contiguity to mar- ket, with less natural waste land, and with a soil better, on an average, than that of the Valley, do not come within fifty per cent, of their value, and are worth only about thirty-three per cent, more than the still more remote and, in many cases, in- accessible lands of Trans-Alleghany, with their sparse population and vast unsettled districts ; nor need we invoke the same kind of authority to show that in the general department of stock, whether we regard numbers or quality, we are decidedly behind both those regions. True, a new era has dawned on the country we speak of, but it is as yet very far from the perfect day we would wish to see. The present improvements are mainly referable to ploughing, draining and liming — three things in- dispensable, v but not all-sufficient to fertility — and to guano, which we believe will not prove a per- manent improver. More pains are taken now than formerly in collecting manures, but the means of making them are, for the most part, such as have always existed, and there is no immediate prospect of increasing the source of supply. Nor, whilst we admit the necessity of making wheat, need we state the figures to show that even if we could grow it perpetually in such quantities and with the same facility as when lands are in the first stages of improvement by lime, clover and plaster, or by guano, that it is not the most profit- able staple, and that it should not enter so largely into the rotation of the cismontane farmer. Suffice it to say, that the Black Sea, the Mediterranean, and other parts of continental Europe, furnish more than two-thirds of the European demand, in ordi- nary years, and have a continued capacity to rival the whole United States in these markets. If this be so, then it follows that our true policy is to make more wheat on the same breadth of land, and at the same time to vary our staples, particularly by the introduction of some sort of TJTTC SOTITRP.RN THE SOUTHERN PL A NTTCR PLANTER. =mt 01 Df iu3i ; b-" -==============^= live stock. ■ it 't it may be seen that we are not speaking at landom in this matter we refer to an instance, but an instance only, of English farming, adduced in the very sensible address of Mr. C. P. Holcombe before the Maryland Agricultural So- ciety last fall. He mentions a farm of twelve hun- dred acres of very superior land, which employs 44 hands in summer and 34 in winter, 30 and 20 in the respective seasons being women — in each case exclusive of harvesters — and on which 24 horses are constantly worked. For this land the tenant pays a rent of $15,000 and other expenses which bring his annual outlay up to $25,000. Of the whole 1200 acres, seven hundred, including 250 in turnips, the equivalent of our corn crop, are de- voted to grazing and feeding, and only a little over one hundred of the residue goes in wheat. But this produces forty-six or seven of our bushels per acre, which, for say 125 acres, is 5875 bushels, full as much as would be made on a plantation of simi- lar size and soil here, where twice or thrice as much is put in wheat, but still insufficient to pay the rent and expenses, even at two dollars a bushel, by nearly ten thousand dollars. "Now to keep this farm," Mr. Holcombe remarks, " in the condition its intelligent and successful pro- prietor desires, if he were to make grain its prin- cipal product and sell that off from the farm, the annual outlay for manure would have to be very great, and the fifteen thousand dollars annual rent probably would not be made — their idea seems to be, that the profits of breeding and grazing, what- ever they may be, are clear profits, while in selling grain, they are selling labor and manure, or a por- tion of the valuable constituents of the soil, all of which have to be brought back in the market again." Accordingly, as he says in another place, he keeps and feeds from six to seven hundred sheep, and turns off about two hundred and fifty head of cattie in the course of the year, that is one sheep for each acre of the seven hundred, and one bullock for every two acres and four-fifths of the same, which, rating one bullock for six sheep, is 2200 sheep, or nearly two for each acre of the farm. We do not, of course, expect that the whole of the region we speak of, containing nearly three millions of acres of improved or cleared land, shall go at once up to the number here indicated, or that the whole of it is so fertile as to possess the same acuable capacity, but we do contend that in the progress of time a proportionate number of stock can be reared therein, that there will then be ample room for their resulting products in the markets of the world, and that the agricultural condition of the district will be elevated in the precise rate of this increase. There is no danger now of a surplus of cattle, though every subscriber to the Planter should go at once into the business. And as to wool, it is well known to those who have looked at all into the subject, that this is, perhaps, the only purely agricultural staple the supply of which is below the demand. The deficiency of Great Britain alone for the last year was estimated at 87,500,000 pounds, and in this country the year before last we exported of fine wool 538,000 pounds, and imported of all sorts 5,400,000 pounds, showing a domestic deficit of 4,862,000 pounds. As a consequence of this state of things and in proof of it, we may refer to all the cheaper woollen fabrics, the quaiity of which has greatly dete- riorated, many of them being now made of rotten woollen rags, which have been carded and worked up a second, and possibly a third time, and all being considerably adulterated with cotton. These are believed to be, for the most part, the materials of the cheap ready made clothing, which is well known to be generally worthless and unable to hold either thread or dye. There is no question that this deficit, which is chiefly in the grades of fine wool can be more cheaply supplied by Virginia and the South and South-West than any where else. South America raises nothing but very coarse inferior wools which cannot be laid down here at less than thirty cents a pound, and she is now at a stand in the produc- tion of wool. Spain and Portugal have long been decreasing in their supply. So have Germany and Prussia for twenty years — France, from her pecu- liar land laws, cannot continue her present rate of production — Australia, which from peculiarity of climate and the nature of the climate and population, was never formidable to determined competition, has now exchanged wool for gold, and the Cape of Good Hope, containing only a narrow strip of sheep country, can never, from particular circumstances, become a serious rival. What is thought of wool growing in the United States where it has been most extensively followed may be learned from the case of Vermont, which, with an area nearly seven times less than Virginia, has almost as many sheep and much more wool than the latter. But their climate is against the business and has diminished it by nearly a million of sheep since the census of 1840, in the face of good prices. It is estimated that it costs there from $1 34 to $1 90 to keep the sheep, and her yield of wool is only 3g lbs. per head; so that at anything less than sixty cents a pounds she loses money. So, in a^ measure, of New York, whose climate is only a little less rigid, and whose dearer lands makes the keeping of sheep almost as ex- pensive as in Vermont. Here the cost will be a very light matter. Mr. Crenshaw on his farm in Orange winter before last kept 450 Merino sheep on 230 acres of land without any feed except what they could pick up on a bare ad Street, north side, between 3d and 4th streets, Richmond, Virginia, keeps constantly on hand a full assortment of ready made Boots and Shoes of his own manufacture, for Ladies' and Children's wear, which he will sell as low as can be purchased in this city. Boots and Shoes for Gentlemen and Boys on hand, or made to order at short nolice. Servants' Shoes of all qualities always on hand. fC^*All work warranted.«CI 5^ Farmers are invited to give him a call, oc — ly ZIMMERMAN & CO.'S CELEBRATED PATENT PREMIUM THRESHER, CLEANER AND BAG- GER, which received the first premium at the Crystal Pa- lace, New York, this making ten premiums in two seasons, in competition with the most celebrated Separators of the day; proving conclusively, that simplicity in construction, cheapness in price and durability in machine, is being fully appreciated, and the old complicated costly separators must yield their place to a superior machine. This Machine, for threshing, separating, cleaning twice, screening and bag- ging, (by one simple operation,) all kinds of Grain — the greatest labor-saving machine extant; for simplicity, dura- bility, cheapness and capacity, it has no rival in the world. It is capable of turning out, ready for the mill or for seed, from 300 to 500 bushels of wheat per day, with six or eight horses, and eight hands — or from 500 to 800 bushels with twelve horses and as many hands, doing the work cleaner, and breaking less grain, than any machine now in use. This machine received the first premiums at the Maryland State Pair, Baltimore, in 1852 and 1853; the Washington County Maryland Fair ; Valley Agricultural Fair of Virginia, in 1852 and 1853; the Rappahannock Agricultural Society, at Port Royal, Virginia; Indiana State Fair, Indianapolis, 1853. This machine is so simple in construction, that the one fan and shoe completely cleans and bags the grain, dis- pensing with all the complicated machinery (and consequent liability of derangement) in all other separators, thus making it more desirable to the farmer. JPI^Shop Prices of Zimmerman & Co.'s Thresher, Cleaner, Bagger and Power — Thresher, Cleaner and Bagger complete, 6 and 8 horses, $175; Power for same, $100 — making $275 for the whole complete. Thresher, Cleaner and Bagger, 36 inch Cylinder, $200; Power for same, $135, for 8, 10 and 12 horses. This machine is complete with Band, Wrenches, &c. §3P References. — Samuel Sands, Esq., Editor of the "American Farmer;" Col. Edward Lloyd, Easton, Md.; Capt. D. Cox, Northumberland county, Va.; Hill Carter, Esq., Richmond; Richard Willis, Esq., Richmond; Col. Charles Carroll, near Ellicott's Mills, Md.; F. Nelson, Esq., Richmond; Col. B. Davenport, Jefferson county, Va.; Dr. Harding, Northumberland county, Va.; Captain Harding, Northumberland county, Va.; Hugh Nelson, Esq., Clarke county, Va.; Charles Mason, Esq., King George county, Va.; S. W. Thomas, Esq., Clarke county, Va.; Dr. T. J. Mario w, Frederick city, Md.; David Boyd, Esq., Frederick city, Md.; Ezra Houck, Frederick city, Md.; Samuel Holt, Middletown Valley, Md.; John Clagett, Hagerstown, Md. jjJ3^ The a bove machines are manufactured in Charles- town, Jefferson county, Virginia. All orders addressed to us will be attended to with promptness, and all Threshers sent out warranted to come up to the standard. ZIMMERMAN & CO. ap — 3t* FRUIT TREES,