THE Devoted to Agriculture, Horticulture, and the Household Arts Agriculture is the nursing mother of the Arts I TilWn „~ 1 t> j ~ " J-^kon^^ __J | tetatel-S"^ 6 "° ^ tW ° brea8ts ° f ^ FEANK. G. KUFFIN, Editor. Vol. XVI. F. G. RUFFIN & N. AUGUST, P R0 V RS . RICHMOND, JULY, 1856. No. 7. COMMUNICATION. To the Editor of the Southern Planter: Mr Dear Sir-1 have read, with unmixed £f^'? e i Cntl< ^V n your last * umb er o° my little book, entitled "Liberty and Slavery" and desire thus publicly to thank the writer tor his manly strictures no less than for hi* generous praise. Indeed, as truth is dearer to every true i man than reputation, so such criti- cism should be more coveted than the most ex- S d e ° c , 0I ? lums - , Hence, if it were not believed that truth is involved in the issue, I should far more reluctantly endeavor to repel the charges which have %een urged against my little essay I fear, sir, that there must be some want of clearness in my expressions, or some other defect 1^1 m °£? of P r ? s . ent jng the subject treated of, ' since so able a critic has charged me, not only with self-contradiction .in regard to a- funda- mental point, but also with having "surrend- th! J. "S?™*?*" t0 the abolitionists. On the other hand it has seemed to me, that if he had more carefully weighed the import of my words, he would have seen that the self-contra 7 die ion complained of is apparent only, and not real. This point, however, I shall not presume naSn rf 5? Cheerfall 7 SUbmit i4 10 the SS! nation of the impartial reader The strictures in question are introduced with the remark that the abolitionists usually appeal to the Declaration of Independence. This t very true. The Declaration of Independence is as understood by themselves, the greLst/ong! fni of the' l^ htl0n,StS - A At *» A ^st meef- • g I- , th A" American Anti-Slavery Society" in which Wm. Loyd Garrison, Lucy Stone Theo- dore Parker, and Lucretia Mott, acted the most "SSaT/effV* W " reS ° lved ^at slavery *h? ■ u? l iebateable question, any more than is the right to commit adultery, burMary hfeh- way robbery* or piracy." '^And to S'ery de- fence or apo ogy" thereof, continues the relolu «W' IVJ? the «°° d ° Id revolution^ S 1 ;: We hold these truths to be self-evident that al men- are create,! equal; that they are en- dowed by their Creator with certain ESSE rights; that among these are life, liberty an the pursuit of happiness " "Deny, an quesUo n feS «"r»" 5 to go unchecked. But let us see in +i,« « ? place, if, in assuming this nositTon tY firSt tradicted myself. S P osltlOD > I have con- Having referred to this position that lift. »»a liberty may be alienated, the Trite -of 'the art? cle in question continues " Yet the author S previously pointed out the error of deS S lienable nghts as those over which soS had no control. < An inalienable right/ he says fn 35) is either one which the posses or of i?him ' self cannot alienate or transfer nr;*' which society has not the power to tat^f ^ Jim According to the imporTof the S5ft3 ■AiolAistt, an alienable r iht ft""J £ft society itself cannot, Sou! Sftf^gSS L r rdoes e the dlV l UaI -' • 1rt » We ^Peclfut" ask, does the author reject the 'import of the hS'" a Onth: Pt